← Knowledge base
Audits and accreditation

Common non-conformities in RecyClass audits

RecyClass audit non-conformities often arise from inconsistencies between procedures, actual processes and records. Traceability, suppliers, volume reconciliation and scope control are particularly sensitive areas.

Common non-conformities in RecyClass audits
Updated:
October 5, 2026
•
2
min read
SOURCE STATUS

Translation of the Polish original, whose sources were editorially reviewed on 28 September 2026. Translation prepared on 5 October 2026; no independent expert approval.

Read in another language:
PolishGerman
AT A GLANCE

Common problems include outdated supplier certificates, incomplete traceability, inconsistent volume reconciliation, undocumented changes and claims that exceed the actual certification scope.

1. An outdated or unsuitable supplier certificate

The company holds a supplier document, but the certificate has expired, concerns another site or does not cover the purchased material.

2. A break in traceability

The material can be linked to its supplier at receipt, but that information is lost when it is transferred into a silo, assigned a different warehouse code or combined with other batches.

3. An inconsistent volume reconciliation

Purchases, stocks, production and sales do not form a coherent whole. Common causes include omitted losses, internal regrind, transfers or different units of measurement.

4. Recycled content claims are not supported by data

The value stated in a specification or marketing communication cannot be reproduced from the recipe, actual dosing or production data.

5. A lack of change control

The supplier, recipe, line, site or material has changed, but the organisation has not assessed the effect on the certification scope and earlier claims.

6. Inconsistency between storage and documentation

Material identification at the site does not match the codes used in the system or documents. The auditor cannot establish the batch status unambiguously.

7. Quality control exists only on paper

The procedure requires testing, but results are missing, the frequency differs from that declared, or there is no clearly defined response to an out-of-specification result.

8. The certificate scope is interpreted too broadly

The company presents products, sites or characteristics as certified even though the actual certificate does not cover them.

How should a non-conformity be addressed?

Go beyond correcting a single document. First resolve the immediate problem, then establish its cause and implement action that reduces the risk of recurrence. Evidence of effectiveness should be proportionate to the type of problem.

Key takeaway

A mature system enables the organisation to detect inconsistencies, identify their causes and correct them effectively, rather than relying on the assumption that mistakes never happen.

HOW TO USE THIS ARTICLE

Practical guidance grounded in source documents

Use the current scheme documentation and the actual scope of your activities when making decisions about a specific process. Check the dates and sources below.

CHECK THE DATE

Scheme requirements and regulations change. Publication and update dates show which version of the requirements the article reflects.

CHECK THE SOURCE

For RecyClass requirements, consult the current scheme documentation; for legal requirements, the applicable legislation; and for accreditation status, official PCA documents.

APPLY IT TO YOUR PROCESS

The same requirement may have different implications depending on the process, site, material, product, module or scheme version. An article does not replace an individual assessment of the scope.

SOURCES AND REFERENCES

Editorial source review of the Polish original: 28 September 2026.

Primary source: RecyClass Resources — Audit Schemes.

Before applying the requirements to a specific process, check the current edition of the relevant documents, the scheme scope and any subsequent updates.

FURTHER READING

Related articles

ALMALAND
Do you have a question about this topic?
Ask Almaland